home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT0908>
- <title>
- Apr. 03, 1989: America Abroad
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Apr. 03, 1989 The College Trap
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 20
- America Abroad
- How to Move the Immovable
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Strobe Talbott
- </p>
- <p> Yitzhak Shamir personifies intransigence. Wherever he goes,
- even if it is just to his office in Jerusalem, he is attended
- by low expectations for Arab-Israeli diplomacy. Still, his visit
- to Washington next week could advance the cause of peace if his
- encounters with the American President, Congress and the Jewish
- community reinforce the message he has been getting back home:
- something has to give on the occupied territories.
- </p>
- <p> Shamir believes that Israel has a historic birthright to
- the lands it seized from Jordan in the 1967 War. After 21 years
- of Israeli rule and settlements in the West Bank, Palestinian
- Arabs still outnumber Jews there 16 to 1. For demographic
- reasons alone, it is hard to see how "Greater" Israel can remain
- a Jewish state and still be a true democracy. Nor is an Israel
- whose soldiers are ordered to break teenagers' bones the "light
- unto the nations" that its Zionist founders wanted.
- </p>
- <p> Not incidentally, those founders -- David Ben-Gurion and
- Chaim Weizmann -- detested the Stern Gang that was implicated
- in terrorist bombings and assassinations. Shamir was one of its
- most notorious members. If Israel refuses to budge on the West
- Bank, it could, over time, become just another Levantine war
- zone pretending to be a country, in which latter-day equivalents
- of the Stern Gang battle with the most extremist of the
- Palestinians.
- </p>
- <p> Like all other Administrations since 1967, the new
- leadership in Washington believes that Israel must at some point
- trade some of the West Bank for peace. The U.S. opened a
- dialogue with the P.L.O. last year because it hoped the
- organization was redefining the first two words of its name: the
- "Palestine" to be "liberated" is on the West Bank; it does not
- include pre-1967 Israel. As part of an eventual agreement, the
- U.S. is looking for reciprocal territorial concessions by
- Israel.
- </p>
- <p> But forcing the issue now will do no good and could do harm
- by giving Shamir an excuse to dig in his heels. Likud has
- consolidated its strength in recent local elections, so it would
- be folly to peg American diplomacy to the more pliable policies
- of the weakened Labor Party.
- </p>
- <p> Left to his own devices and instincts, Shamir would come to
- the U.S. with his jaw out, his dukes up and nothing in his
- pocket. The idea of a "Shamir initiative" sounds like a
- contradiction in terms. His preferred role is still that of
- defiant custodian of the status quo.
- </p>
- <p> But the status quo is untenable. That is the message Shamir
- has been getting not just from the Palestinian stone throwers
- but from their antagonists in the Israeli army as well. It is
- a reminder of the enduring humanism and idealism of the Zionist
- state that many of its warriors hate breaking bones and say so
- to their Prime Minister.
- </p>
- <p> So Shamir knows he needs to make a move, if only to escape
- the impression that he alone is standing still while events run
- beyond his control. He is expected to arrive with a proposal for
- elections among the Palestinians in the West Bank, followed by
- negotiations between those elected representatives and Israel.
- He wants to buy time by avoiding the question of whether Israeli
- withdrawal from -- and Arab sovereignty over -- the West Bank
- might someday be on the agenda of those negotiations. The Bush
- Administration will probably not insist that he bless the idea
- of territorial compromise in advance, but as his part of the
- bargain he had better not rule it out forever. That would
- probably be as much flexibility as the U.S. or the Arabs are
- likely to get out of this Israeli leader. But it might be enough
- to restart the diplomatic process; and perhaps that process will
- continue long enough for other Israeli statesmen to decide where
- it finally leads.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-